The Nakamal Agreement has been signed, but at what cost?
Australia has secured the Nakamal Agreement with Vanuatu, but at what diplomatic cost? Siobhan McDonnell examines the pressure tactics used, the one-sided obligations imposed on Vanuatu and the goodwill Canberra may have sacrificed for a single treaty. About the author/s Siobhan McDonnell Siobhan McDonnell is an Associate Professor at the Crawford School of…
Why this matters
This matters because diplomatic sequencing often reveals alignment changes before force posture does. The Pacific file is strongest when it follows local politics and public priorities first.
Continue with Diplomacy & Statecraft. For background, read Why Pacific Islands politics matter strategically.
Formal statements are best read alongside the meetings, commitments, and implementation that follow. Changes in language and participation can clarify where cooperation is deepening and where disagreements remain.
Local agency is essential to understanding the Pacific Islands: political transitions, adaptation pressures, and public capacity often provide more context than external narratives alone.
What to watch next
- • Summits, foreign-minister meetings, and new joint statements
- • Minilateral groupings such as the Quad, AUKUS, and trilateral formats
- • Sanctions, export controls, and coercive diplomacy responses
- • Watch for subsequent responses from officials or institutions in Pacific Islands.
Editorial approach
IndoPac briefs are concise, attribution-forward summaries. They explain why a development matters in its regional context while preserving a direct link to the originating source.
Create a free reader account to choose regions, topics, and how often stories reach your inbox.
Create a free reader account